Compare Daniel Elazar’s three develops of political cultureDescribe just how social distinctions in between the claims have the right to shape mindsets around the function of federal government and citizen participationDiscuss the primary criticisms of Daniel Elazar’s theory

Some says, such as Alaska, are endowed with natural sources. They deserve to usage their oil or herbal gas reserves to their advantage to fund education or reduce taxes. Other claims, prefer Florida, are favored via a climate that attracts tourists and retirees each winter, illustration in revenues to assistance facilities enhancements throughout the state. These distinctions have the right to result in strategic benefits in the economic fortunes of a state, which have the right to interpret into differences in the levels of taxes that must be accumulated from citizens.

You are watching: Which of the following would best characterize traditional individualistic political culture

But their economic fortunes are just one component of what makes individual states distinctive. Theorists have long proposed that claims are likewise distinct as a duty of their differing political societies, or their mindsets and ideas around the attributes and expectations of the federal government. In the book, Amerideserve to Federalism: A View from the States, Daniel Elazar initially theorized in 1966 that the USA could be divided into 3 unique political cultures: moralistic, individualistic, and traditionalistic. The diffusion of these cultures throughout the USA is attributed to the migratory trends of immigrants that settled in and also spcheck out out across the country from the eastern to the west shore. These settlers had distinct political and religious worths that influenced their beliefs about the correct function of federal government, the require for citizen involvement in the autonomous procedure, and also the function of political parties.


Daniel Elazar posited that the USA can be split geographically right into three kinds of political cultures—individualistic, moralistic, and traditionalistic—which spreview via the migratory trends of immigrants across the country.

Moralistic Political Culture

In Elazar’s structure, states through a moralistic political culture check out the government as a means to much better culture and also promote the basic welfare. They suppose political officials to be hoswarm in their dealings through others, put the interests of the civilization they serve over their very own, and commit to boosting the area they represent. The political procedure is seen in a positive light and also not as a auto tainted by corruption. In truth, citizens in moralistic cultures have bit patience for corruption and also believe that political leaders need to be urged by a desire to benefit the neighborhood fairly than by a need to profit financially from service.

Moralistic claims for this reason tend to assistance an broadened function for federal government. They are more most likely to believe federal government should promote the basic welfare by allocating funds to programs that will certainly benefit the negative. In enhancement, they view it as the duty of public officials to advocate for new programs that will benefit marginal citizens or solve public plan problems, also as soon as public press to do so is missing.

The moralistic political culture emerged among the Puritans in upper New England also. After several generations, these inhabitants relocated westward, and also their worths diffprovided across the top of the United States to the upper Great Lakes. In the middle of the 1800s, Scandinavians and also Northern Europeans joined this group of inhabitants and also reinrequired the Puritans’ worths. Together, these teams pushed even more west with the north portion of the Midwest and also West and then alengthy the West Coast.<1>

States that determine with this culture worth citizen engagement and also desire citizen participation in all creates of political affairs. In Elazar’s model, citizens from moralistic states must be more most likely to donate their time and/or resources to political projects and to vote. This occurs for two major reasons. First, state regulation is most likely to make it easier for inhabitants to register and also to vote because mass participation is valued. 2nd, citizens that hail from moralistic claims must be even more likely to vote bereason elections are truly challenged. In other words, candidates will certainly be less most likely to run unopposed and also more likely to confront real competition from a qualified enemy. According to Elazar, the heightened competition is a role of individuals’ believing that public business is a worthwhile undertaking and also an honorable profession.

Individualistic Political Culture

States that align with Elazar’s individualistic political culture view the federal government as a system for addressing issues that matter to individual citizens and also for pursuing individual objectives. People in this society communicate with the federal government in the very same manner they would certainly interact through a marketplace. They expect the government to carry out items and services they watch as important, and also the public officials and also bureaucrats that carry out them intend to be compensated for their initiatives. The focus is on meeting individual demands and also private objectives rather than on serving the finest interests of everyone in the area. New plans will certainly be enacted if political leaders deserve to usage them to garner support from voters or various other interested stakeholders, or if tright here is great demand also for these services on the component of people.

According to Elazar, the individualist political culture originated with settlers from non-Puritan England and Germany kind of. The initially settlements were in the mid-Atlantic region of New York, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey and also diffused into the middle portion of the USA in a relatively straight line from Ohio to Wyoming.

Given their emphasis on pursuing individual objectives, claims with an individualistic mindset will certainly tend to advancement taxes breaks as a method of trying to rise a state’s economic climate or as a system for fostering individual initiative and entrepreneurship. For instance, New Jersey governor Chris Christie made headlines in 2015 as soon as discussing the incentives he offered to tempt businesses to the state. Christie motivated a number of businesses to move to Camden, where unemployment has risen to nearly 14 percent, by providing them through numerous countless dollars in taxes breaks.<2> The governor hopes these corporate incentives will spur task development for citizens who need employment in an economically depressed area of the state.

Because this theoretical lens assumes that the objective of national politics and the federal government is to advancement individual interests, Elazar argues that people are motivated to come to be involved in politics only if they have an individual interemainder in this location or wish to be in charge of the provision of federal government benefits. They will certainly tfinish to reprimary connected if they acquire enjoyment from their participation or rewards in the create of patronage appointments or financial compensation. As a result of these individual motivations, citizens in individualistic says will tend to be even more tolerant of corruption among their political leaders and much less likely to watch national politics as a noble profession in which all citizens need to engage.

Finally, Elazar says that in individualistic claims, electoral competition does not seek to identify the candidate with the ideal concepts. Instead it pits versus each other political parties that are well arranged and contend straight for votes. Voters are loyal to the candidates that host the exact same party affiliation they perform. As an outcome, unfavor the instance in moralistic societies, voters perform not pay much attention to the characters of the candidates as soon as deciding just how to vote and also are less tolerant of third-party candidates.

Traditionalistic Political Culture

Given the prestige of slavery in its development, a traditionalistic political culture, in Elazar’s debate, sees the government as essential to preserving the existing social order, the condition quo. Only elites belong in the political enterpincrease, and as a result, new public plans will certainly be progressed just if they reinforce the ideas and interests of those in power.

Elazar associates traditionalistic political society through the southern percent of the United States, wright here it developed in the top regions of Virginia and Kentucky prior to spanalysis to the Deep South and the Southwest. Like the individualistic society, the traditionalistic culture believes in the prestige of the individual. But rather of profiting from corpoprice ventures, inhabitants in traditionalistic says tied their economic fortunes to the requirement of slavery on plantations throughout the South.

When chosen officials do not prioritize public policies that benefit them, those on the social and also financial fringes of society deserve to be plagued by poverty and also pervasive health troubles. For instance, although the map below reflects that poverty is a problem across the whole United States, the South has actually the greatest incidence. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the South additionally leads the nation in self-reported excessive weight, carefully adhered to by the Midwest.

See more: Which Of The Following Was A Result Of The Sepoy Rebellion ?

<3> These statistics current obstacles for lawmakers not only in the short term but likewise in the long term, bereason they should prioritize fiscal constraints in the face of flourishing demand also for services.