Patagonia’s Nano Puff collection has actually remained in stores for almost a decade. It was so famous, even North Face has actually a variation – the Thermoround.
You are watching: Difference between nano puff and micro puff
At the moment of the release, it was a revolutionary outerwear arsenal – a heat, lightweight jacket that stuffs into its own pocket? Sign me up, please!
Last year, Patagonia came out via the Micro Puff repertoire, which intends to carry out the exact same task as the Nano Puff, but simply a tiny better.
So, which one carry out you go for? Do you buy the classic that thousands of world can vouch for? Or perform you stick with the “brand-new is constantly better” rule? We will tell you every little thing you have to recognize around these jackets, and also help you make that decision even more easily!
What Are The Differences?
Acomponent from the apparent design distinctions, tbelow are a couple of points that Patagonia attempted to improve with the Micro Puff. Did they succeed? See for yourself.
While both of these jackets have actually artificial insulation, Patagonia opted to go through proprietary insulation in the more recent jacket. The Micro Puff is insulated via 65 grams of PlumaFill – man-made insulation made 100% from Polyester.
PlumaFill is designed so that it deserve to replicate the framework or organic dvery own, which permits it gives you through the very same levels of warmth and packcapacity as down.But, because it is artificial, itperforms a lot better in wet weather.That’s because natural dvery own insulation consists of dvery own clusters that clump up when wet. As such, they don’t trap body warmth nearly as effectively as soon as wet.
Patagonia’s PlumaFill doesn’t have actually that issue – Polyester is able to save you really warmth also once it gets completely wet. Additionally, it helps that Patagonia puts the majority of insulation in these jackets. The regular Micro Puff functions 65 grams of insulation, which is actually about a quarter of its entire weight!
But PrimaLoft Gold Insulation, which is provided in the Nano Puff jackets, is able to do the same thing. Plus, it’s arguably the much better type of insulation – PrimaLoft is provided by dozens of various brands, whereas PlumaFill is only supplied by Patagonia. You have the right to check out the efficiency of PrimaLoft on many various examples, and also so you are more sure of its quality.
In addition, the Nano Puffs are insulated with PrimaLoft Gold Eco –the finest kind of this insulation that exists.It offers a higher warmth-weight proportion than various other types of PrimaLoft,which is exactly how the Nano Puff jackets control to be so lightweight. Plus, it is breathable, water-resistant, and packable, and also made from 55% recycled content.If being environmentally mindful is important to you, the Nano Puff is the obvious alternative.
But in regards to simply performance, it is really hard to say that one is outappropriate better than the other. The two types of insulation are method also similar to effectively compare them, and also both do exactly what they are expected to –they save you warmth even in the rain while being extremely lightweight and also packable at the exact same time.
Weight To Warmth Ratio And Packability
One of the best differences in between the Nano and also the Micro Puffs is in their average weights.Let’s usage the men’s dimension M as an example below – theNano Puff jacket weighs 337 grams (11.9 ounces). The Micro Puff jacket in the same exact size weighs just 235 grams (8.3 ounces).
That’sa 102-gram difference. And while that could not seem prefer a lot, considering tbelow are jackets that weigh a number of pounds, it actually renders a substantial distinction here. Especially since both jackets have actually approximately the same amount of insulation in them. If you desire to talk mathematics, the insulation in the Nano Puff accounts for 17.8% of the jacket. With the Micro Puff, that number is higher – 27.7%.
And if we are to trust the numbers, the Micro Puff need to be the warmer choice.
But if we are talking simply around packcapacity, I don’t think that those 102 grams make that huge a distinction.Both jackets are packable and also stow right into an inner pocket.So, you deserve to transform both of them right into a tiny little pillow. Both of these pillows are about the same size and one of them is a deck of cards heavier than the other. Does that make you categorically refuse to buy the heavier pillow? I don’t think it does.
Obviously, the Micro Puff is the lighter alternative. If that’s your primary problem, then absolutely go for the newer Puffs– the distinction is even more than noticeable. But if you’re worried around packability more than pure weight, either of these Patagonia jackets is still a great choice.
The Micro Puff arsenal is more expensive than the Nano Puff. Each of the commodities prices $50 even more than its Nano Puff equivalent (hoody, jacket, vest).
I think that’s to be intended, given that it’s the more recent arsenal. If you’re mainly worried about the price and want to gain the even more affordable choice. the Nano Puffs are the noticeable alternative. Unmuch less you think the lighter weight and also greater weight-warmth ratio of the Micro Puffs are worth the $50.
One Thing They Have In Common
Both the Nano Puffs and also the Micro Puffs are designed as sports jackets. They offer premium breathcapacity, which you need as soon as you’re engaging in tasks that make you sweat, prefer hiking, skiing, jogging, or whatever.
Their primary function is to store you dry both on the inside and the external while retaining the body warmth that you yourself are generating. They are not correct winter jackets – if that’s what you’re searching for, I suggest you inspect out our post on the top Gore-Tex alternatives.
See more: Why Are Liquids And Solids Not Included In Equilibrium Expressions
But you have the right to wear the Puffs as a mid-layer, or just carry them on adventures that call for you to have actually lightweight, warmth protection. Furthermore, they aregreat jackets for Fall and also Spring, largely because of their performance in wet weather.